Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the association between birth weight (BW), childhood and adolescent BMI, with reproductive capacity in men.
Design
A prospective, population-based cohort study (Northern Finland birth cohort 1966).
Methods
Around 6196 men born in 1966 were followed from birth to age 50 years. Weight and height were measured repeatedly by professionals. Reproductive capacity (infertility assessment, male factor infertility and infertility treatment by age 46 years) was evaluated by questionnaires at ages 31 and 46 years. The number of children by the age of 50 years was recovered from registers. After excluding the men who reported never having attempted to have children or not answering the question at age 31 or 46 years (n = 2041), 4128 men were included in the final study population. Results were adjusted for BW, BW for gestational age (GA), mother’s smoking status, marital status, educational level and smoking status.
Results
Being small for GA (10.5% vs 8.2%, P = 0.012) or having a lower BW (3495 g vs 3548 g, P = 0.003) were associated with childlessness. The association was however no longer significant after adjusting for marital status. Being underweight in early childhood was associated with an increased risk of infertility assessment (adjusted, aOR: 2.04(1.07–3.81)) and childlessness (aOR: 1.47(1.01–2.17)) compared to the normal weight group. Conversely, overweight or obesity in early childhood was associated with a decreased risk of infertility assessment (aOR: 0.60 (0.41–0.87)), treatment (aOR: 0.42 (0.25–0.70)) and male factor infertility (aOR: 0.45 (0.21–0.97)). BMI in mid-childhood or puberty had no association with infertility or childlessness.
Conclusion
In boys, an optimal growth trajectory during pregnancy and early childhood seems to be very important for life-long fertility.
Introduction
Obesity is a worldwide pandemic, and the increasing rate of childhood obesity is especially concerning as it increases the risk of long-term health problems (1, 2). Adult obesity is a risk factor for infertility and childlessness not only in women (3, 4) but also in men (5, 6). Infertility affects approximately 15% of the couples trying to conceive and male infertility accounts for 20–30% of all infertility causes and, in combination with female factors, for another 30% (7, 8). There are three main causes of male infertility: obstruction of seminal outflow, hypothalamic–pituitary disease (secondary hypogonadism) and testicular dysfunction (primary hypogonadism) (8, 9). Obesity is linked to the latter two conditions (5, 6, 10), but an association between low BMI and fertility is under debate (11, 12).
To our knowledge, only two previous studies have been conducted in adolescent boys, showing an inverted J-shaped relationship between BMI and later reproductive capacity (13, 14). Studies concerning association between childhood growth and testicular function have shown that unfavorable fetal growth patterns, especially being small for gestational age (SGA) (15, 16, 17, 18) and non-optimal growth and high adiposity in childhood, are associated with impaired testicular function in adulthood (17). Typically, BMI increases from birth and reaches a maximum at age 7–9 months (adiposity peak, AP), after which it decreases, reaching its nadir at age 4–6 years (adiposity rebound, AR) (19, 20, 21). Early AR, occurring before 5 years (21), has been correlated with obesity and a poor metabolic profile in adulthood (20, 21).
This study is an extension of our previous study on women’s childhood growth and fertility (22). The aim of the study was to evaluate, in men, the association between childhood underweight, overweight and obesity with adulthood fertility among three age groups (early childhood, mid-childhood and puberty) and the association of BMI and timing of AP and AR with infertility parameters. Reproductive capacity was evaluated by assessing the occurrence of investigation and treatment for infertility, and male factor infertility by age 46 years, as well as childlessness and number of children by age 50 years.
Methods
The study population was drawn from a general population birth cohort, the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (NFBC1966), recruited at gestational week 24 from the two northernmost provinces of Finland. The study included a total of 12 058 live births (6169 males), covering 96% of all births in this area (23). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District. All participants provided informed consent. (Fig. 1)
Flowchart of the study population.
Citation: European Journal of Endocrinology 187, 6; 10.1530/EJE-22-0385
The questionnaires for ages 31 and 46 years included questions on lifestyle, education, family history, health and fertility (Supplementary Table 1, see section on supplementary materials given at the end of this article). To the following question: ‘Have you ever attempted to have children?’ 4026 men answered at age 31 years and 3012 at age 46 years. Of these, 3372 and 2802 had attempted to have children by 31 or 46 years, respectively, and the final study population included 4128 men who had attempted to have children by age 46 years (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1). In total, 322 men reported that they had never attempted to have children and they were excluded from the study.
The outcomes concerning infertility were defined based on the answers to the questionnaires at 31 and 46 years (Supplementary Table 1). The number of childbirths recorded up to the end of 2016 (when the men turned 50 years) was obtained from the Finnish Medical Birth Register, which was established in 1987. Birth data before 1987 were collected from the Population Register Center live births to make the birth data complete. The final study population was divided into five groups: infertility assessment (n = 390), male factor infertility (n = 111), infertility treatment (n = 259), childlessness (n = 969) and the reference group which comprised men without any fertility problem (n = 2856) (Fig. 1). Men without any fertility problems were used as a reference group in all analyses.
Growth data and definition of obesity and underweight in the study population
The weight and height of the children aged 6 and 12 months were measured by experienced nurses. The BMI of children aged 6 months (n = 2725) and 12 months (n = 3513) was analyzed separately. Data on weight and height from infancy to adolescence were collected from measurements reported by the child health and welfare nurses, and later by the school nurses, as part of the national child health program, which is free for all children in Finland.
Three different age groups were created: early childhood (from infancy to adrenarche: 3.00–6.99 years, n = 2603), mid-childhood (juvenile stage: 7.00–10.99 years, n = 2826) and puberty (adolescence: 11.00–15.99 years, n = 2927), according to the literature regarding childhood growth (24, 25) and physiological hormonal changes (adrenal cortex activation and gonadal maturation) occurring during childhood until adolescence (26, 27). If participants had more than one measurement per year, the mean BMI for that year was calculated. Median number of measurements per age period (range) was two in early childhood (0–12), two in mid-childhood (0–12) and three in puberty (0–18). For each age group, the participants were stratified into underweight (below 5th percentile (pc)), normal weight (5th–85th pc), overweight (85th–95th pc) and obese (over 95th pc) categories according to the criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (28). Being obese or underweight in any of the specified age groups was defined by the occurrence of at least one annual BMI value over the 95th pc or under the 5th pc, respectively. This categorization has been widely used in studies concerning fertility, hormonal parameters and childhood growth (13, 14, 17, 22, 29, 30).
The timing of AP and AR was derived from fitted growth curves, as described previously, and for each participant, predicted BMI at AP and AR was calculated using the estimated fixed and random coefficients (31). The normal changes observed in childhood BMI required the data to be split into two age windows: infancy (2 weeks to 1.5 years) and childhood (1.5 to 13 years). There were, on average, 7 measurements during infancy and 16 during childhood for each child. Calculation of AP (n = 2339) and AR (n = 2922) was made only for the children having at least three measurements during childhood.
Height and weight at age 14 were all measured and reported by the parents (n = 3644) and used only for continuous analyses. There was no statistical difference between measured (n = 2401) and self-reported BMI at age 14 years (mean BMI, 19.35 vs 19.31 kg/m2). Height and weight at age 31 years were measured at the clinical examination. If measurements were not available, self-reported data were used. There was no statistically significant difference between self-reported (25.51 kg/m2) and clinically measured (25.30 kg/m2, P = 0.103) BMI.
Covariates
Prenatal factors (maternal age, smoking at the end of pregnancy, pre-pregnancy BMI), birth weight (BW), birth length (BL), BW−BL ratio, BW for gestational age (GA) and GA were included in the background factors as they are known to be associated with childhood growth (32) and childlessness (15, 33). Data on BW, BL and GA (defined from the last menstrual period) were collected by local midwives in the antenatal clinics. Individuals with BW under the 10th pc for GA were considered as small for GA (SGA) and individuals with BW over the 90th pc for GA were considered as large for GA (LGA). Marital status was defined as either ‘being single’ (both at ages 31 and 46 years) or ‘ever being in long relationship’ (ever married/cohabited/divorced/widowed). Alcohol consumption, smoking and educational level (used as a proxy for socioeconomic status in this cohort) at age 31 years were classified based on the questionnaire (Table I online only). According to a directed acyclic graph (Supplementary Fig. 1), BW, BW for GA, mother’s smoking and marital status, as well as smoking and educational level at age 31 years, were selected for the adjustment models (www.dagitty.net).
Statistical methods
Differences in the continuous variables were analyzed by an independent t-test, a Mann–Whitney U test, a one-way ANOVA or a Kruskal–Wallis test, as appropriate. To assess differences in the categorical parameters, a chi-square test was used. For these tests, results were reported as means or medians, standard deviations (s.d.) or prevalence (%) and odds ratios (OR) with a 95% CI, respectively. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Bonferroni correction was used for additional analyses in different age groups. Multivariable analyses were conducted using binary logistic regression modeling. The results were reported as OR with 95% CI. Linear and quadratic associations between the number of children (the birth of the sixth or any subsequent child was not considered since only 2.9% of the participants had more than six children) and BW and BMI at 14 years were assessed with regression models. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) was used to assess differences between the study groups and to perform the regression analyses.
Results
Characteristics of the study population
The number of participants varied between each age group and different fertility outcomes, owing to variations in the number of answers to each question and/or participation in the clinical examination (Table 1). In all, 1272 (30.8%) men reported a fertility problem (infertility assessment or treatment) or remained childless (Fig. 1). Men who had children were more likely to have ever been in a relationship compared with their counterparts. Men who underwent infertility assessment and treatment were more often non-smokers and had higher education level. Men with male factor infertility had higher education level, but their smoking habits did not differ. In contrast, childless men had lower education level, but they also smoked less. Alcohol consumption was not associated with any of the infertility variables (Table 1).
Characteristics of the study population. Men who reported never having attempted to have children were excluded from the analyses. ‘No infertility problems’ was used as a reference group. Data are presented as mean ± s.d. or as percentages.
| No infertility problemsa | Infertility assessment before age 46 years | Male factor infertility before age 46 years | Infertility treatments before age 46 years | Childlessness by age 50 years | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 2856 | 390 | 111 | 259 | 969 |
| Mother’s parameters | |||||
| Mother’s prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2) | 23.87 ± 9.84 | 23.39 ± 9.61 | 22.72 ± 10.75 | 23.99 ± 9.61 | 23.63 ± 9.15 |
| Mother’s age (years) | 27.99 ± 7.12 | 28.34 ± 7.22 | 26.91 ± 6.86 | 28.08 ± 6.85 | 28.54 ± 6.94 |
| Mother’s smoking at the end of pregnancy (%) | 14.5 | 14.1 | 19.6 | 17.8 | 16.8 |
| Index person’s parameters | |||||
| Childhood | |||||
| Birth weight (g) | 3548 ± 536 | 3555 ± 540 | 3524 ± 559 | 3560 ± 564 | 3495 ± 559* |
| Birth length (cm) | 50.25 ± 5.52 | 50.83 ± 3.33 | 50.90 ± 2.26 | 50.93 ±2.13 | 50.18 ± 4.85 |
| Birth weight–length ratio (g/cm) | 70.34 ± 8.36 | 70.18 ± 8.78 | 69.66 ± 8.66 | 79.34 ± 8.98 | 69.46 ± 8.73* |
| Size for gestational age (%) | |||||
| SGA | 8.2 | 9.1 | 10.0 | 8.2 | 10.5* |
| AGA | 80.4 | 78.9 | 80.0 | 79.7 | 80.0 |
| LGA | 11.4 | 12.0 | 10.0 | 12.1 | 9.5 |
| Gestational age (week) | 40.01 ± 1.88 | 40.07 ± 1.81 | 39.91± 1.85 | 40.09 ± 1.80 | 39.89 ± 1.92 |
| Prematurity (born before 37th GW) (%) | 4.4 | 3.9 | 6.4 | 3.9 | 5.8 |
| BMI 6 months (kg/m2) | 17.93 ± 1.60 | 17.79 ± 1.50 | 17.87 ± 1.56 | 17.74 ± 1.54 | 17.80 ± 1.69 |
| BMI 1 year (kg/m2) | 18.07 ± 1.61 | 18.05 ± 1.56 | 18.11 ± 1.46 | 17.97 ± 1.58 | 17.99 ± 1.56 |
| Age AP (months) | 9.09 ± 0.43 | 9.10 ± 0.37 | 9.11 ± 0.39 | 9.09 ± 0.38 | 9.07 ± 0.35 |
| BMI AP (kg/m2) | 18.23 ± 0.79 | 18.15 ± 0.75 | 18.16 ± 0.74 | 18.07 ± 0.75* | 18.11 ± 0.77* |
| Age AR (years) | 5.72 ± 0.81 | 5.68 ± 0.78 | 5.70 ± 0.80 | 5.73 ± 0.81 | 5.67 ± 0.92* |
| BMI AR (kg/m2) | 15.47 ± 0.94 | 15.48 ± 0.94 | 15.35 ± 0.86 | 15.37 ± 0.90 | 15.43 ± 1.00 |
| BMI 14 years (kg/m2) | 19.28 ± 2.47 | 19.31 ± 2.24 | 19.21 ± 2.58 | 19.19 ± 2.09 | 19.43 ± 2.81 |
| Adulthood | |||||
| Ever been in long relationship (%) | 94.6 | 97.9** | 96.7 | 97.7** | 50.1** |
| BMI 31 years (kg/m2) | 25.38 ± 3.49 | 25.12 ± 3.15 | 25.45 ± 3.69 | 25.13 ± 3.04 | 25.42 ± 4.05 |
| BMI 46 years (kg/m2) | 27.32 ± 4.15 | 27.03 ± 3.29 | 27.87 ± 5.22 | 27.17 ± 4.14 | 27.63 ± 4.74 |
| Alcohol consumption 31 years (g/day) | 14.35 ± 21.90 | 11.85 ± 15.50 | 13.53 ± 21.45 | 12.24 ± 17.15 | 16.88 ± 29.76 |
| Smoking 31 years (%) | |||||
| Non-smoker | 35.0 | 44.2* | 36.3 | 44.3* | 40.8* |
| Former/occasional smoker | 28.6 | 27.8 | 25.5 | 30.3 | 22.6* |
| Active smoker | 36.4 | 28.0* | 38.2 | 25.4* | 36.6 |
| Education 31 years (%) | |||||
| Basic | 12.2 | 6.4* | 9.6* | 7.3* | 14.2 |
| Secondary | 71.8 | 71.1 | 71.3 | 68.2 | 73.1 |
| Tertiary | 15.9 | 22.4* | 19.1* | 24.5* | 12.7* |
| Number of children | 2.65 ± 1.67 | 1.61 ± 1.53** | 1.57 ± 1.60** | 1.58 ± 1.53** | NA |
*P < 0.05; **P < .001 compared with the reference group;
aNo infertility problems is defined as men without childlessness, infertility assessment and treatment
AGA, appropriate for gestational age; GW, gestational week; LGA, large for gestational age; NA, not applicable; SGA, small for gestational age.
Prenatal factors and birth weight
Prenatal factors did not associate with any of the infertility variables or childlessness (Table 1). No associations between BW or SGA and infertility assessment, treatment or male factor infertility were found. SGA was associated with an increased risk of childlessness when compared to the appropriate for GA (ORSGA: 1.39 (1.06–1.83), P = .019) (Table 1). BW and BW−BL ratio were inversely associated with childlessness (Table 1) and BW with number of children in adulthood (Fig. 2A). After adjusting with marital status, however, the associations between BW and childlessness (adjusted aORBW: 0.98 (0.97–1.01), P =.124), between BW−BL ratio and childlessness (aORBW–BL ratio: 0.99 (0.98–1.01), P = 0.345) and between SGA and childlessness (aORSGA: 1.23 (0.88–1.72), P = .210) lost their significance. A linear trend for a positive association between BW and number of children remained, even after adjusting for marital status in the regression analysis (Fig. 2A).
(A and B) Curve estimation between birth weight (BW) (A) and BMI at age 14 years (B), and number of children by age 50. Men who reported never having attempted to have children were excluded. Both models were adjusted for mother’s smoking, marital status until age 46 and education and smoking at age 31. Model B was also adjusted for BW and BW for gestational age.
Citation: European Journal of Endocrinology 187, 6; 10.1530/EJE-22-0385
Infancy
BMI at ages 6 and 12 months did not associate with infertility assessment, treatment, male factor infertility or childlessness by age 50 (Supplementary Table 2).
AP and AR
Lower BMI at AP, but not age, was associated with childlessness, but the significance was lost after adjusting for marital status. BMI at AR did not associate with infertility variables or childlessness. Age at AR did not associate with infertility variables, but AR at an earlier age associated with an increased risk of childlessness after adjustments (Table 2).
Association between age and BMI at adiposity peak/rebound and fertility outcomes. Men who reported never having attempted to have children were excluded from the analyses. ‘No infertility problems’ were used as a reference group. Results are shown as odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI.
| Infertility assessments before age 46 | Male factor infertility before age 46 years | Infertility treatments before age 46 | Childlessness by age 50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adiposity peak, n | 1872 | 1700 | 1790 | 2157 |
| Age | ||||
| Crude | 0.93 (0.64–1.36) | 0.94 (0.45–1.95) | 0.80 (0.49–1.30) | 0.84 (0.64–1.11) |
| Model I | 0.91 (0.62–1.34) | 0.93 (0.43–1.94) | 0.80 (0.49–1.31) | 0.84 (0.63–1.11) |
| Model II | 0.91 (0.63–1.34) | 0.93 (0.44–1.93) | 0.79 (0.49–1.29) | 0.93 (0.66–1.29) |
| Model III | 0.90 (0.60–1.31) | 0.90 (0.45–1.92) | 0.77 (0.47–1.26) | 0.92 (0.65–1.28) |
| BMI | ||||
| Crude | 0.94 (0.78–1.13) | 0.97 (0.68–1.38) | 0.82 (0.65–1.03) | 0.83 (0.72–0.96)* |
| Model I | 0.94 (0.77–1.12) | 0.99 (0.67–1.41) | 0.82 (0.64–1.02) | 0.82 (0.71–0.95)* |
| Model II | 0.94 (0.78–1.12) | 0.98 (0.68–1.41) | 0.82 (0.65–1.03) | 0.86 (0.72–1.01) |
| Model III | 0.95 (0.79–1.15) | 1.00 (0.69–1.44) | 0.83 (0.66–1.04) | 0.85 (0.72–1.01) |
| Adiposity rebound, n | 2342 | 2128 | 2234 | 2698 |
| Age | ||||
| Crude | 0.89 (0.76–1.05) | 0.87 (0.64–1.18) | 0.93 (0.76–1.14) | 0.92 (0.84–1.04) |
| Model I | 0.89 (0.77–1.05) | 0.84 (0.62–1.16) | 0.93 (0.75–1.15) | 0.91 (0.81–1-03) |
| Model II | 0.90 (0.76–1.06) | 0.85 (0.62–1.15) | 0.94 (0.77–1.15) | 0.83 (0.72–0.96) |
| Model III | 0.87 (0.74–1.04) | 0.84 (0.61–1.15) | 0.91 (0.74–1.12) | 0.85 (0.74–0.97)* |
| BMI | ||||
| Crude | 0.96 (0.83–1.10) | 0.85 (0.63–1.14) | 0.91 (0.75–1.10) | 0.95 (0.85–1.04) |
| Model I | 0.95 (0.84–1.11) | 0.86 (0.65–1.16) | 0.91 (0.75–1.10) | 0.96 (0.86–1.08) |
| Model II | 0.95 (0.83–1.11) | 0.86 (0.65–1.17) | 0.91 (0.76–1.09) | 1.01 (0.89–1.12) |
| Model III | 0.96 (0.83–1.11) | 0.88 (0.66–1.17) | 0.92 (0.76–1.10) | 1.01 (0.90–1.14) |
*Statistical significance after Bonferroni correction.
Model I: adjustment for birth weight, birth weight for gestational age and mother’s smoking at the end of pregnancy;
Model II: Model I + adjustment for marital status until age 46;
Model III: Model II + adjustment for education and smoking at age 31.
Early childhood
Only 5.4% of boys who were underweight in early childhood and 23% of boys who were obese in early childhood remained underweight or obese in adulthood, respectively.
Being underweight in early childhood was associated significantly with childlessness (Table 3) and with a tendency for having fewer children by age 50 years, after adjustments (Fig. 3). In contrast, overweight was associated with a decreased risk of being assessed for infertility and being diagnosed for male factor infertility. Both overweight and obesity were associated with a lower risk of infertility treatment but not with childlessness or number of children (Table 3). When combining boys with overweight and obesity into a same group, a decreased risk of infertility assessment, male factor infertility and infertility treatment was noted (aOR: 0.60 (0.41–0.87), P = .002; 0.45 (0.21–0.97), P = .040 and 0.42 (0.25–0.70), P = .001, respectively). There was neither association with childlessness (aOR: 0.93 (0.69–1.25), P = .643) nor any significant difference in number of children when compared to normal weight boys (2.10 vs 2.09, P = .843).
Total number of children by age 50 in early childhood, mid-childhood and puberty. Men who reported never having attempted to have children were excluded from the analyses. The results were adjusted for birth weight (BW), BW for gestational age, mother’s smoking, marital status until age 46 and education and smoking at age 31. Normal weight is used as a reference group. Adj, adjusted; y, year; UW, underweight (BMI < 5th percentile (pc)); NORM, normal weight (BMI 5th–85th pc); OW, overweight (BMI 85th–95th pc); OB, obese (BMI > 95th pc).
Citation: European Journal of Endocrinology 187, 6; 10.1530/EJE-22-0385
Association between childhood underweight, overweight and obesity in different age groups and the fertility outcomes compared to the normal weight boys. Men who reported never having attempted to have children were excluded from the analyses. ‘No infertility problems’ were used as a reference group. Results are shown as OR with 95% Cl.
| No infertility problemsa | Infertility assessments before age 46 | Male factor infertility before age 46 years | Infertility treatments before age 46 | Childlessness at age 50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early childhood, n | 1838 | 260 | 70 | 160 | 560 |
| Underweight | |||||
| n (%) | 56 (3.0) | 13 (5.0) | 8 (11.4) | 7 (4.4) | 31 (5.5) |
| Crude | Ref | 1.85 (0.99–3.45) | 1.37 (0.61–3.10) | 1.37 (0.79–2.39) | 2.00 (1.45–2.72)* |
| Model I | Ref | 1.45 (0.91–2.31) | 1.37 (0.60–3.12) | 1.44 (0.82–2.53) | 1.92 (1.40–2.63)* |
| Model II | Ref | 1.50 (0.94–2.39) | 1.35 (0.59–3.09) | 1.48 (0.84–2.59) | 1.49 (1.02–2.19) |
| Model III | Ref | 1.55 (0.97–2.49) | 1.37 (0.60–3.15) | 1.54 (0.87–2.73) | 1.47 (1.01–2.17) |
| Overweight | |||||
| n (%) | 302 (16.4) | 32 (12.3) | 6 (8.6) | 15 (9.4) | 79 (14.1) |
| Crude | Ref | 0.69 (0.47–1.02) | 0.37 (0.15–0.94) | 0.42 (0.23–0.76)* | 0.88 (0.67–1.15) |
| Model I | Ref | 0.67 (0.45–0.99) | 0.38 (0.15–0.96) | 0.41 (0.23–0.73)* | 0.89 (0.68–1.17) |
| Model II | Ref | 0.67 (0.45–0.99) | 0.38 (0.15–0.96) | 0.41 (0.23–0.74)* | 0.89 (0.65–1.23) |
| Model III | Ref | 0.65 (0.44–0.97) | 0.37 (0.14–0.93) | 0.38 (0.21–0.69)* | 0.88 (0.64–1.22) |
| Obese | |||||
| n (%) | 199 (10.8) | 19 (7.3) | 5 (7.1) | 10 (6.3) | 62 (11.1) |
| Crude | Ref | 0.56 (0.31–1.01) | 0.46 (0.14–1.51) | 0.34 (0.14–0.84)* | 1.01 (0.72–1.44) |
| Model I | Ref | 0.55 (0.31–0.99) | 0.47 (0.15–1.52) | 0.33 (0.13–0.82)* | 1.03 (0.72–1.45) |
| Model II | Ref | 0.55 (0.31–0.99) | 0.47 (0.14–1.52) | 0.33 (0.13–0.82)* | 1.10 (0.73–1.65) |
| Model III | Ref | 0.65 (0.38–1.01) | 0.47 (0.15–1.53) | 0.34 (0.13–0.84)* | 1.11 (0.74–1.66) |
| Mid-childhood, n | 1998 | 275 | 75 | 171 | 613 |
| Underweight | |||||
| n (%) | 106 (5.3) | 18 (6.5) | 7 (9.3) | 12 (7.0) | 45 (7.3) |
| Crude | Ref | 1.27 (0.74–2.17) | 1.78 (0.75–4.25) | 1.32 (0.69–2.54) | 1.45 (0.98–2.15) |
| Model I | Ref | 1.29 (0.76–2.21) | 1.67 (0.69–4.06) | 1.36 (0.70–2.62) | 1.44 (0.96–2.12) |
| Model II | Ref | 1.33 (0.77–2.28) | 1.63 (0.68–3.97) | 1.40 (0.74–2.69) | 0.99 (0.60–1.62) |
| Model III | Ref | 1.34 (0.79–2.33) | 1.64 (0.66–3.97) | 1.43 (0.74–2.79) | 1.00 (0.61–1.63) |
| Overweight | |||||
| n (%) | 211 (10.6) | 26 (9.5) | 9 (12.0) | 16 (9.4) | 62 (10.1) |
| Crude | Ref | 0.77 (0.49–1.19) | 0.61 (0.24–1.54) | 0.60 (0.33–1.10) | 1.01 (0.72–1.43) |
| Model I | Ref | 0.76 (0.50–1.18) | 0.62 (0.28–1.59) | 0.59 (0.32–1.09) | 0.97 (0.72–1.32) |
| Model II | Ref | 0.77 (0.50–1.19) | 0.63 (0.26–1.58) | 0.59 (0.33–1.10) | 1.00 (0.73–1.33) |
| Model III | Ref | 0.77 (0.50–1.22) | 0.63 (0.25–1.61) | 0.60 (0.33–1.11) | 1.02 (0.72–1.44) |
| Obese | |||||
| n (%) | 145 (7.3) | 15 (5.5) | 4 (5.3) | 6 (3.5) | 50 (8.2) |
| Crude | Ref | 0.78 (0.45–1.40) | 0.89 (0.32–2.51) | 0.55 (0.24–1.28) | 1.05 (0.73–1.53) |
| Model I | Ref | 0.77 (0.46–1.39) | 0.94 (0.30–2.66) | 0.54 (0.23–1.27) | 1.09 (0.74–1.59) |
| Model II | Ref | 0.76 (0.44–1.37) | 0.96 (0.33–2.70) | 0.54 (0.23–1.26) | 1.20 (0.78–1.86) |
| Model III | Ref | 0.80 (0.45–1.44) | 0.98 (0.35–2.78) | 0.59 (0.24–1.36) | 1.23 (0.78–1.89) |
| Puberty, n | 2059 | 286 | 75 | 177 | 641 |
| Underweight | |||||
| n (%) | 201 (9.8) | 24 (8.4) | 4 (5.3) | 18 (10.2) | 72 (11.2) |
| Crude | Ref | 0.69 (0.42–1.14) | 0.47 (0.15–1.51) | 0.85 (0.47–1.53) | 1.19 (0.87–1.61) |
| Model I | Ref | 0.70 (0.40–1.16) | 0.46 (0.15–1.46) | 0.87 (0.46–1.52) | 1.01 (0.63–1.46) |
| Model II | Ref | 0.70 (0.42–1.18) | 0.44 (0.14–1.44) | 0.86 (0.47–1.57) | 0.85 (0.55–1.30) |
| Model III | Ref | 0.70 (0.43–1.18) | 0.44 (0.13–1.45) | 0.88 (0.48–1.59) | 0.85 (0.57–1.24) |
| Overweight | |||||
| n (%) | 208 (10.1) | 31 (10.8) | 4 (5.3) | 16 (9.0) | 68 (10.6) |
| Crude | Ref | 1.17 (0.82–1.69) | 0.84 (0.37–1.86) | 1.08 (0.67–1.73) | 1.14 (0.87–1.49) |
| Model I | Ref | 1.15 (0.80–1.67) | 0.85 (0.36–1.87) | 1.07 (0.68–1.73) | 1.16 (0.88–1.51) |
| Model II | Ref | 1.16 (0.81–1.66) | 0.84 (0.37–1.88) | 1.07 (0.67–1.71) | 1.30 (0.92–1.75) |
| Model III | Ref | 1.21 (0.84–1.75) | 0.84 (0.38–1.88) | 1.13 (0.69–1.72) | 1.32 (0.96–1.80) |
| Obese | |||||
| n (%) | 142 (6.9) | 17 (5.9) | 6 (8.0) | 12 (6.8) | 58 (9.0) |
| Crude | Ref | 0.88 (0.50–1.53) | 1.01 (0.36–2.85) | 0.99 (0.51–1.94) | 1.34 (0.95–1.90) |
| Model I | Ref | 0.90 (0.51–1.50) | 1.03 (0.35–2.88) | 0.99 (0.49–1.96) | 1.33 (0.94–1.91) |
| Model II | Ref | 0.86 (0.50–1.51) | 1.03 (0.36–2.88) | 0.98 (0.50–1.92) | 1.34 (0.91–2.03) |
| Model III | Ref | 0.95 (0.55–1.60) | 1.05 (0.37–2.96) | 1.08 (0.54–2.13) | 1.39 (0.92–2.12) |
aNo infertility problems is defined as men without childlessness, infertility assessment and treatment;
*Statistical significance after Bonferroni correction
ref: reference.
Model I: adjustment for birth weight, birth weight for gestational age and mother’s smoking at the end of pregnancy;
Model II: Model I + adjustment for marital status until age 46;
Model III: Model II + adjustment for education and smoking at age 31
Mid-childhood
Among boys in mid-childhood, 4.5% of those who were underweight and 31.7% of those who were obese remained underweight or obese in adulthood, respectively. Weight class in mid-childhood had no significant association with infertility assessment, male factor infertility, infertility treatment, childlessness (Table 3) or number of children (Fig. 3).
Puberty
Among boys in puberty, 3.5% of those who were underweight and 41.1% of those who were obese remained underweight or obese in adulthood, respectively. Weight class in puberty did not associate with infertility assessment, male factor infertility or infertility treatment, childlessness (Table 3) or number of children (Fig. 3). There was an inverse J-shaped (i.e. quadratic) association between BMI at age 14 years and number of children in adulthood, i.e. boys with low and high BMI had fewer children than normal weight boys. This association vanished after adjusting for marital status (Fig. 2B).
Discussion
In this population-based cohort study, our main observation was that boys who had a lower BW, who were born SGA and those who were underweight during early childhood had an increased risk of involuntary childlessness as adults. Furthermore, these boys had fewer children in adulthood. Especially association between BW/SGA and childlessness was highly influenced by the decreased probability to have a partner. In contrast, being overweight or obese during early childhood was associated with a decreased risk of infertility assessment, male factor infertility and infertility treatments in adulthood. According to our results, BMI after mid-childhood was not associated with infertility.
Our study involved a large, population-based cohort and incorporated data from birth until age 50 , as such, provided a unique opportunity to investigate associations between childhood growth and several fertility parameters in adulthood. The study population was ethnically homogeneous. The data on births were reliable as they were derived from the Finnish Medical Birth Register and the Population Register Centre, which together account for all births in Finland. All measurements from birth until adolescence – except BMI at age 14, which was used for curve estimation – were performed by trained professionals at every stage. Additionally, men who reported never having attempted to have children were excluded. Another novel contribution of the present work was that, in addition to analyzing specific childhood and adolescent age groups, childhood growth trajectory data and important physiological landmarks (AP and AR) were also assessed.
Our finding that lower BW and SGA, but not early GA, were associated with childlessness and a lower number of children are in line with a previous study showing that men with unfavorable fetal growth patterns in utero, especially men born SGA, were more likely to have decreased sperm counts (15, 16, 17). Also, higher BW for GA has been shown to associate with better sperm concentration in young adults (18). On the other hand, many contrasting results have been published (29, 34, 35). In our study, the association between lower BW and SGA with childlessness was lost after adjusting for marital status, which may indicate that reproductive performance of boys with lower BW and SGA is rather influenced by social factors, decreasing their opportunity to establish a relationship and therefore to have children. According to the literature and our study, the correlation between BW and overall fertility appears as a complex phenomenon wherein social factors should be considered (33, 36, 37, 38).
In early childhood, underweight boys had a higher risk of childlessness, whereas boys with overweight and obesity had a lower risk for infertility assessment, male factor infertility and treatment as adults, when compared to normal weight boys. BMI from mid-childhood onwards was not associated with indices of infertility. An Australian cohort study investigating the influences of growth and adiposity in childhood through adolescence on testicular function in adulthood showed that optimal BMI trajectory through childhood and adolescence was associated with a larger testicular volume and higher serum inhibin B and T in adulthood. They also showed that poor childhood growth was associated with an increased risk of smaller testes (17). Another study from the United States could not confirm these findings but showed that overweight and obesity in young men at age 20 years were associated with poorer sperm quality (18).
The mechanisms behind the association between BMI and fertility parameters in early childhood may be multifactorial. Soon after birth, levels of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone and consequently levels of testosterone increase in boys, peaking between 1 week and 3 months, decreasing thereafter gradually until 6–9 months of age (39). The testosterone peak is associated with penile and testicular growth and with the proliferation of gonadal cells. This so-called ‘mini-puberty’, first described in the 1970s (40), is an important developmental stage (41) that may have impact on reproductive capacity later in life (42, 43, 44), as there is a linear correlation between testosterone levels in mini-puberty with growth velocity in infancy and early childhood. In boys, lower levels of testosterone in the first 5 months of life were associated with lower fat-free mass/lean body mass ratio and higher adiposity during the subsequent 6 years (45). Moreover, in boys with Klinefelter syndrome, testosterone substitution in the early months increased total body mass, growth velocity and fat-free mass and reduced fat mass (46).
Mini-puberty and early childhood are complex developmental stages, marked by nutritional, genetic and epigenetic factors (39, 47). In our population, we were unable to determine adiposity and fat-free mass in infancy or childhood, being aware that BMI alone does not depict the whole-body composition. BMI in childhood is influenced by chronic illnesses and psychosocial environment that can strongly affect the growth (48, 49) and exert a negative impact on later fecundability (50, 51). Childhood growth restriction increases the likelihood of insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases in adulthood (47, 52, 53), which again are associated with infertility and lower levels of testosterone (10, 54, 55).
The present findings are in contrast to our results reported in girls from the same cohort (22) and in other female study populations (13, 14, 30, 56) in which mid-childhood and adolescence overweight and obesity have been associated with childlessness and decreased fecundability in adulthood. In girls, underweight in adolescence – but not at younger ages – has been associated with an increased risk of infertility treatment but not with childlessness in adulthood (22). This pattern did not occur among adolescent boys in the present study. Indeed, we found an inverse J-shaped correlation between number of children and BMI at age 14 years, which is in line with previous studies (13, 14). In our study, the significance was lost after marital status was considered, indicating again that social factors are strongly associated with growth patterns, infertility problems and family size from adolescence onwards.
In this study, AR at a younger age, but not BMI, was associated with childlessness, in line with our results obtained in girls in this same study population (22). Early AR has previously been linked to adverse metabolic outcomes and obesity (20, 21) and polycystic ovary syndrome in adult women (57). Based on our study, it seems that earlier age of AR in boys is associated with childlessness independently of marital status, but that BMI at the age of AR does not associate with infertility or childlessness later in life.
Our study has some limitations. Despite high participation rates at all data collection points, complete growth data were not available for all participants (missing n = 1149, i.e. 27% of the study population) and the lack of longitudinal data from AR onwards is a limitation of this study. As underweight and obesity were defined by the presence of at least one BMI value under or over the 95th pc in any age group, respectively, there was likely to be an over-diagnosis, especially in early childhood. Also, BMI does not remain constant throughout life and is especially prone to fluctuations from birth until the age at which AR occurs (58). Evidence from the current study supports the literature in this regard, as only 23% of boys in early childhood who had been classified as obese ‘at least once’ remained obese in adulthood; likewise, only 5.4% of those who had been considered underweight at least once remained underweight in adulthood. Another limitation of the present research was that data collection ended at age 50, even though male fecundity does not. However, according to the official statistics of our country, only 1% of men have their first child after 50 years of age (59). Infertility outcomes were self-reported, which can be considered as a limitation. Nevertheless, previous studies have shown a reliable correlation between self-reported fertility treatments and medical records (60, 61). Moreover, the self-reported data in the present study (male factor infertility rate: 28.5%; infertility treatment rate: 10.1%) are in line with the data from previous studies in other countries, which have indicated a 5–15% prevalence of infertility in the general population and a 20–30% rate for male infertility (7, 8). Last, childlessness, especially number of children, is certainly not fully valid measure for relative fertility, as social factors play a role in determining family size.
In conclusion, the current study revealed that boys with lower BW, SGA and lower BMI during early childhood were more likely to experience infertility-related problems and were at an increased risk of childlessness and having fewer children as adults. Unlike girls, boys with overweight or obesity in later childhood and puberty displayed no increased risk for infertility problems, childlessness or decreased number of children, after considering marital status. In boys, optimal growth during pregnancy as well as during early childhood seems to be very important for life-long fertility.
Supplementary materials
This is linked to the online version of the paper at https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-220385.
Declaration of interest
Terhi T Piltonen is on the editorial board of the European Journal of Endocrinology. Terhi T Piltonen was not involved in the review or editorial process for this paper, on which she is listed as an author and in the decision to submit it for publication. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding
NFBC1966 received financial support from University of Oulu Grant no. 65354, Oulu University Hospital Grant no. 2/97, 8/97, Ministry of Health and Social Affairs Grant no. 23/251/97, 160/97, 190/97, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki Grant no. 54121, Regional Institute of Occupational Health, Oulu, Finland Grant no. 50621, 54231. Researches own funding: The Finnish Medical Foundation, the North Ostrobothnia Regional Fund, the Academy of Finland (project grants 315921, 104781, 120315, 129269,1114194, 24300796, 321763, 268336), Center of Excellence in Complex Disease Genetics and SALVE, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Biocenter Oulu, University Hospital Oulu and University of Oulu (75617), Jalmari ja Rauha Ahokkaan säätiö¨, The Finnish Medical Foundation, Medical Research Center Oulu, National Institute for Health Research (UK), The European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (under Grant agreement no. 633595 for the DynaHEALTH action and GA 733206 for LifeCycle). The funders had no role in study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, in the writing of the article.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all cohort members and researchers who participated in the 31 and 46 years study. The authors also wish to acknowledge the work of the NFBC project center.
References
- 1↑
Pérez Rodrigo C Current mapping of obesity. Nutricion hospitalaria 2013 28(Supplement 5) 21–31. (https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2013.28.sup5.6915)
- 2↑
Ward ZJ, Long MW, Resch SC, Giles CM, Cradock AL, Gortmaker SL. Simulation of growth trajectories of childhood obesity into adulthood. New England Journal of Medicine 2017 377 2145–2153. (https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1703860)
- 3↑
Nelson SM, Fleming R. Obesity and reproduction: impact and interventions. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007 19 384–389. (https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32825e1d70)
- 4↑
Brewer CJ, Balen AH. The adverse effects of obesity on conception and implantation. Reproduction (Cambridge, England) 2010 140 347–364. (https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-09-0568)
- 5↑
Katib A Mechanisms linking obesity to male infertility. Central European Journal of Urology 2015 68 79–85. (https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.01.435)
- 6↑
Craig JR, Jenkins TG, Carrell DT, Hotaling JM. Obesity, male infertility, and the sperm epigenome. Fertility and Sterility 2017 107 848–859. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.02.115)
- 7↑
Anderson JE, Farr SL, Jamieson DJ, Warner L, Macaluso M. Infertility services reported by men in the United States: national survey data. Fertility and Sterility 2009 91 2466–2470. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.022)
- 8↑
Agarval A, Baskaran S, Parekh N, Cho C, Henkel R, Vij S, Arafa M, Panner Selvam MK, Shah R. Male infertility. Lancet 2021 397 319–333. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(2032667-2)
- 9↑
Krausz C Male infertility: pathogenesis and clinical diagnosis. Best Practice and Research. Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2011 25 271–285. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2010.08.006)
- 10↑
Eisenberg ML, Kim S, Chen Z, Sundaram R, Schisterman EF, Buck Louis GM. The relationship between male BMI and waist circumference on semen quality: data from the LIFE study. Human Reproduction 2014 29 193–200. (https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det428)
- 11↑
Sermondade N, Faure C, Fezeu L, Shayeb AG, Bonde JP, Jensen TK, Van Wely M, Cao J, Martini AC & Eskandar M et al.BMI in relation to sperm count: an updated systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update 2013 19 221–231. (https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms050)
- 12↑
Guo D, Xu M, Zhou Q, Wu C, Ju R, Dai J. Is low body mass index a risk factor for semen quality? A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine 2019 98 e16677. (https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016677)
- 13↑
Jokela M, Kivimäki M, Elovainio M, Viikari J, Raitakari OT, Keltikangas-Järvinen L. Body mass index in adolescence and number of children in adulthood. Epidemiology 2007 18 599–606. (https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181257158)
- 14↑
Jokela M, Elovainio M, Kivimäki M. Lower fertility associated with obesity and underweight: the US National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2008 88 886–893. (https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/88.4.886)
- 15↑
Francois I, De Zegher F, Spiessens C, D’hooghe T, Vanderschueren D. Low birth weight and subsequent male subfertility. Pediatric Research 1997 42 899–901. (https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199712000-00029)
- 16↑
Faure C, Dupont C, Chavatte-Palmer P, Gautier B, Levy R & ALIFERT Collaborative Group. Are semen parameters related to birth weight? Fertility and Sterility 2015 103 6–10. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.027)
- 17↑
Hart RJ, Doherty DA, Keelan JA, McLachlan R, Skakkebaek NE, Norman RJ, Dickinson JE, Pennell CE, Newnham JP & Hickey M et al.Early life events predict adult testicular function; data derived From the Western Australian (Raine) birth cohort. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2016 101 3333–3344. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-1646)
- 18↑
Kahn LG, Widen EM, Janevic T, Straka N, Liu X, Cirillo PM, Cohn BA, Buck Louis GM, Factor-Litvak P. The relation of birth weight and adiposity Across the life course to semen quality in middle age. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass) 2019 30(Supplement 2) S17–S27. (https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001070)
- 19↑
Silverwood RJ, De Stavola BL, Cole TJ, Leon DA. BMI peak in infancy as a predictor for later BMI in the Uppsala Family Study. International Journal of Obesity 2009 33 929–937. (https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.108)
- 20↑
Koyama S, Ichikawa G, Kojima M, Shimura N, Sairenchi T, Arisaka O. Adiposity rebound and the development of metabolic syndrome. Pediatrics 2014 133 e114–e119. (https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0966)
- 21↑
Péneau S, González-Carrascosa R, Gusto G, Goxe D, Lantieri O, Fezeu L, Hercberg S, Rolland-Cachera MF. Age at adiposity rebound: determinants and association with nutritional status and the metabolic syndrome at adulthood. International Journal of Obesity 2016 40 1150–1156. (https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.39)
- 22↑
Laru J, Nedelec R, Koivuaho E, Ojaniemi M, Järvelin MR, Tapanainen JS, Franks S, Tolvanen M, Piltonen TT & Sebert S et al.BMI in childhood and adolescence is associated with impaired reproductive function—a population-based cohort study from birth to age 50 years. Human Reproduction 2021 36 2948–2961. (https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab164)
- 23↑
Rantakallio P The longitudinal study of the Northern Finland birth cohort of 1966. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 1988 2 59–88. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.1988.tb00180.x)
- 24↑
Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH. Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity, and stages of puberty. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1976 51 170–179. (https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.51.3.170)
- 25↑
Hochberg Z, Albertsson-Wikland K. Evo-devo of infantile and childhood growth. Pediatric Research 2008 64 2–7. (https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e318177590f)
- 26↑
Witchel SF, Pinto B, Burghard AC, Oberfield SE. Update on adrenarche. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 2020 32 574–581. (https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000928)
- 27↑
Moran A, Jacobs DR, Steinberger J, Hong CP, Prineas R, Luepker R, Sinaiko AR. Insulin resistance during puberty: results from clamp studies in 357 children. Diabetes 1999 48 2039–2044. (https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.48.10.2039)
- 28↑
Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Guo SS, Wei R, Mei Z, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL. CDC growth charts: United States. Advance Data 2000 (314) 1–27.
- 29↑
Ramlau-Hansen CH, Hansen M, Jensen CR, Olsen J, Bonde JP, Thulstrup AM. Semen quality and reproductive hormones according to birthweight and body mass index in childhood and adult life: two decades of follow-up. Fertility and Sterility 2010 94 610–618. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.142)
- 30↑
Jacobs MB, Bazzano LA, Pridjian G, Harville EW. Childhood adiposity and fertility difficulties: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatric Obesity 2017 12 477–484. (https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12168)
- 31↑
Sovio U, Mook-Kanamori DO, Warrington NM, Lawrence R, Briollais L, Palmer CN, Cecil J, Sandling JK, Syvänen AC & Kaakinen M et al.Association between common variation at the FTO locus and changes in body mass index from infancy to late childhood: the complex nature of genetic association through growth and development. P L o S Genetics (Print). PLoS Genetics 2011 7 e1001307. (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001307)
- 32↑
Baidal JAW, Locks LM, Cheng ER, Blake-Lamb TL, Perkins ME, Taveras EM. Risk factors for childhood obesity in the first 1,000 days: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2016 50 761–779. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.11.012)
- 33↑
deKeyser N, Josefsson A, Bladh M, Carstensen J, Finnström O, Sydsjö G. Premature birth and low birthweight are associated with a lower rate of reproduction in adulthood: a Swedish population-based registry study. Human Reproduction 2012 27 1170–1178. (https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der478)
- 34↑
Whitcomb BW, Bloom MS, Kim S, Chen Z, Buck Louis GM. Male birthweight, semen quality and birth outcomes. Human Reproduction 2017 32 505–513. (https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew345)
- 35↑
Jensen RB, Vielwerth S, Larsen T, Greisen G, Veldhuis J, Juul A. Pituitary-gonadal function in adolescent males born appropriate or small for gestational age with or without intrauterine growth restriction. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2007 92 1353–1357. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-2348)
- 36↑
Ekholm K, Carstensen J, Finnström O, Sydsjö G. The probability of giving birth among women who were born preterm or with impaired fetal growth: a Swedish population-based registry study. American Journal of Epidemiology 2005 161 725–733. (https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi096)
- 37↑
Swamy GK, Østbye T, Skjærven R. Association of preterm birth With long-term survival, reproduction, and next-generation preterm birth. JAMA 2008 299 1429–1436. (https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.12.1429)
- 38↑
Pal van der SM, Meulen van der SA, Welters SM, Bakker LA, Groot de CJM, Kaam van AH, Verrips EGHW. Reproductive risks in 35-year-old adults born very preterm and/or with very low birth weight: an observational study. European Journal of Pediatrics 2021 180 1219–1228. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03864-5)
- 39↑
Kuiri-Hänninen T, Sankilampi U, Dunkel L. Activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in infancy: minipuberty. Hormone Research in Paediatrics 2014 82 73–80. (https://doi.org/10.1159/000362414)
- 40↑
Forest MG, Cathiard AM, Bertrand JA. Evidence of testicular activity in early infancy. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1973 37 148–151. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-37-1-148)
- 41↑
Lanciotti L, Cofini M, Leonardi A, Penta L, Esposito S. Up-to-date review About minipuberty and overview on hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis activation in fetal and neonatal life. Frontiers in Endocrinology 2018 9 410. (https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00410)
- 42↑
Cortes D, Müller J, Skakkebaek NE. Proliferation of Sertoli cells during development of the human testis assessed by stereological methods. International Journal of Andrology 1987 10 589–596. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.1987.tb00358.x)
- 43↑
Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, Schmidt IM, Damgaard IN, Kai CM, Chellakooty M & Skakkebaek NE et al.Postnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys. European Journal of Endocrinology 2006 154 125–129. (https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.1.02066)
- 44↑
Kuiri-Hänninen T, Seuri R, Tyrväinen E, Turpeinen U, Hämäläinen E, Stenman UH, Dunkel L, Sankilampi U. Increased activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis in infancy results in increased androgen action in premature boys. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2011 96 98–105. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1359)
- 45↑
Becker M, Oehler K, Partsch CJ, Ulmen U, Schmutzler R, Cammann H, Hesse V. Hormonal ‘minipuberty’ influences the somatic development of boys but not of girls up to the age of 6 years. Clinical Endocrinology 2015 83 694–701. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12827)
- 46↑
Davis SM, Reynolds RM, Dabelea DM, Zeitler PS, Tartaglia NR. Testosterone treatment in infants With 47,XXY: effects on body composition. Journal of the Endocrine Society 2019 3 2276–2285. (https://doi.org/10.1210/js.2019-00274)
- 47↑
Stein AD, Thompson AM, Waters A. Childhood growth and chronic disease: evidence from countries undergoing the nutrition transition. Maternal and Child Nutrition 2005 1 177–184. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2005.00021.x)
- 48↑
Kyle UG, Shekerdemian LS, Coss-Bu JA. Growth failure and nutrition considerations in chronic childhood wasting diseases. Nutrition in Clinical Practice 2015 30 227–238. (https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533614555234)
- 49↑
Onis de M, Branca F. Childhood stunting: a global perspective. Maternal and Child Nutrition 2016 12(Supplement 1) 12–26. (https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12231)
- 50↑
Kenney LB, Cohen LE, Shnorhavorian M, Metzger ML, Lockart B, Hijiya N, Duffey-Lind E, Constine L, Green D, Meacham L. Male reproductive health after childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2012 30 3408–3416. (https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.6938)
- 51↑
De Sanctis V, Soliman A, Mohamed Y. Reproductive health in young male adults with chronic diseases in childhood. Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews : PER 2013 10 284–296 .
- 52↑
Barker DJP, Osmond C. Infant mortality, childhood nutrition and ischeamic heart disease in England and Wales. Lancet 1986 327 1077–1081. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(8691340-1)
- 53↑
Eriksson JG, Forsén T, Tuomilehto J, Jaddoe VWV, Osmond C, Barker DJP. Effects of size at birth and childhood growth on the insulin resistance syndrome in elderly individuals. Diabetologia 2002 45 342–348. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-001-0757-6)
- 54↑
Wang P, Menheere PP, Astrup A, Andersen MR, van Baak MA, Larsen TM, Jebb S, Kafatos A, Pfeiffer AF, Martinez JA & Diogenes consortium. Metabolic syndrome, circulating RBP4, testosterone, and SHBG predict weight regain at 6 months after weight loss in men. Obesity 2013 21 1997–2006. (https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20311)
- 55↑
Choy JT, Eisenberg ML. Male infertility as a window to health. Fertility and Sterility 2018 110 810–814. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.015)
- 56↑
Lake JK, Power C, Cole TJ. Women’s reproductive health: the role of body mass index in early and adult life. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 1997 21 432–438. (https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0800424)
- 57↑
Koivuaho E, Laru J, Ojaniemi M, Puukka K, Kettunen J, Tapanainen JS, Franks S, Järvelin MR, Morin-Papunen L & Sebert S et al.Age at adiposity rebound in childhood is associated with PCOS diagnosis and obesity in adulthood-longitudinal analysis of BMI data from birth to age 46 in cases of PCOS. International Journal of Obesity 2019 43 1370–1379. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-019-0318-z)
- 58↑
Couto Alves A, De Silva NMG, Karhunen V, Sovio U, Das S, Taal HR, Warrington NM, Lewin AM, Kaakinen M & Cousminer DL et al.GWAS on longitudinal growth traits reveals different genetic factors influencing infant, child, and adult BMI. Science Advances 2019 5 eaaw3095. (https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw3095)
- 59↑
Suomen virallinen tilasto (SVT): Perheet (verkkojulkaisu). ISSN=1798–3215. Helsinki: Tilastokeskus (Refered: 24.9.2021).
- 60↑
Herbert D, Lucke J, Dobson A. Agreement between self-reported use of in vitro fertilization or ovulation induction, and medical insurance claims in Australian women aged 28–36 years. Human Reproduction 2012 27 2823–2828. (https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des228)
- 61↑
Stern JE, McLain AC, Louis GMB, Luke B, Yeung EH. Accuracy of self-reported survey data on assisted reproductive technology treatment parameters and reproductive history. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2016 215 219.e1–219.e6. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.010)
